Free RAID Calculator

Instantly calculate RAID capacity, efficiency, and performance for RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10. Get accurate estimates with vendor presets for Synology, QNAP, and ZFS systems.

Free & Open Source
Shareable Links
Embeddable Widget

RAID Configuration

Min: 3 disks for RAID 5

Custom Performance Values

Optional

If you know your disk's specific performance characteristics, enter them here. Otherwise, we'll estimate based on the media type.

Leave empty to use estimated values

Leave empty to use estimated values

RAID 5 requires a minimum of 3 disks.

Can survive failure of 1 disk.

Sponsored
Ads by Google
💾

Enterprise Storage Solutions

Professional RAID & NAS Systems

Ad
AdChoices
Mobile Banner (320px × 50px)

Popular Configurations

Quick-start with proven RAID configurations from leading NAS vendors and storage systems.

Filter by:

DS220+ Basic RAID 1

Synology

Popular
RAID Level:
RAID 1
Disks:
2×4TB
Media:
HDD
Use Case:
home

2-bay NAS with mirroring for data protection

homebasicprotection
Click to configure

DS423+ Performance RAID 5

Synology

Popular
RAID Level:
RAID 5
Disks:
4×8TB
Media:
HDD
Use Case:
home

4-bay NAS with RAID 5 for balanced performance and protection

homeperformancestorage
Click to configure

TS-464 Media Server

QNAP

Popular
RAID Level:
RAID 5
Disks:
4×12TB
Media:
HDD
Use Case:
media

4-bay media server with RAID 5 for large capacity

mediastoragehome
Click to configure

TS-253D Backup Solution

QNAP

Popular
RAID Level:
RAID 1
Disks:
2×6TB
Media:
HDD
Use Case:
backup

2-bay backup NAS with RAID 1 protection

backupprotectionsmall
Click to configure

RAIDZ1 (RAID 5 equivalent)

ZFS

Popular
RAID Level:
RAID 5
Disks:
4×6TB
Media:
HDD
Use Case:
zfs

ZFS RAIDZ1 with 4 drives for balanced performance

zfsenterprisereliable
Click to configure

Basic RAID 1 Mirror

Generic

Popular
RAID Level:
RAID 1
Disks:
2×4TB
Media:
HDD
Use Case:
basic

Simple 2-drive mirror for basic protection

basicsimpleprotection
Click to configure

Need help choosing? Check out our vendor-specific guides:

Ads by Google
💾

Enterprise Storage Solutions

Professional RAID & NAS Systems

Ad
AdChoices
Mobile Banner (320px × 50px)

Popular Configurations

Jump straight into real-world NAS setups. Click a preset to auto-fill the calculator and get a shareable link.

How RAID Works

Understanding RAID levels and their trade-offs between capacity, performance, and reliability.

RAID 0

Striping

Data is split across multiple disks for maximum performance. No redundancy - any disk failure results in total data loss.

Advantages
  • Maximum performance
  • Full capacity utilization
  • Simple implementation
Disadvantages
  • No fault tolerance
  • High failure risk
  • Not suitable for critical data
Best For

Temporary storage, video editing, gaming

RAID 1

Mirroring

Data is duplicated across disk pairs. Excellent reliability but only 50% capacity efficiency.

Advantages
  • Excellent fault tolerance
  • Fast read performance
  • Simple recovery
Disadvantages
  • 50% capacity efficiency
  • Higher cost per TB
  • Write performance penalty
Best For

Critical systems, databases, boot drives

RAID 5

Striping + Parity

Data and parity information distributed across all disks. Good balance of capacity, performance, and protection.

Advantages
  • Good capacity efficiency
  • Single disk fault tolerance
  • Balanced performance
Disadvantages
  • Write performance penalty
  • Vulnerable during rebuild
  • Complex recovery
Best For

File servers, general storage, home NAS

RAID 6

Dual Parity

Similar to RAID 5 but with dual parity for enhanced protection. Can survive two simultaneous disk failures.

Advantages
  • Dual disk fault tolerance
  • Better rebuild safety
  • Good for large arrays
Disadvantages
  • Higher write penalty
  • More complex
  • Requires minimum 4 disks
Best For

Enterprise storage, large arrays, critical data

RAID 10

Mirrored Stripes

Combines RAID 1 mirroring with RAID 0 striping. High performance and reliability but expensive.

Advantages
  • High performance
  • Excellent fault tolerance
  • Fast rebuild times
Disadvantages
  • 50% capacity efficiency
  • High cost
  • Requires even disk count
Best For

High-performance databases, virtualization